Hier sammeln wir die zu lesende Literatur
| Datum | Thema | Artikel | Link/DOI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04.09.26 | Theory | van Rooij, I., & Baggio, G. (2021). Theory before the test: How to build high-verisimilitude explanatory theories in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4) 682–697. | https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/228376/228376.pdf |
| 12.06.26 | p-Values | Some papers about p values | https://onemol.org.uk/?page_id=456 |
| 06.03.26 | Theory | Muthukrishna, M., & Henrich, J. (2019). A problem in theory. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(3), 221-229. | https://www.michael.muthukrishna.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Muthukrishna-A-problem-in-theory.pdf |
| 05.09.25 | Replicabiity | Protzko, J., Krosnick, J., Nelson, L. et al. Retraction Note: High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable. Nat Hum Behav 8, 2067 (2024). | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01997-3 |
| 04.07.25 | Research Ethics | Eisenbeiß, S. et al. (2025). The role of environmental ethics and sustainability in research ethics for linguistics: what is currently available in terms of guidance and how might that be improved?. Linguistics. | https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ling-2023-0203/html |
| 06.06.25 | Implementing Reproducible Practices | Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in methods and practices in psychological science, 1(1), 70-85. | 10.1177/2515245917751886 |
| 09.05.25 | Interpretation | Marchi, A., & Taylor, C. (2009). If on a winter’s night two researchers…: A challenge to assumptions of soundness of interpretation. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 3(1), 1-20. | https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/52392012.pdf |
| 07.03.25 | How to improve psychological theory | Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2021). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 717-724. | https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966796 |
| 07.02.25 | Does psychology have a theory problem? | Scheel et al. (2021). Why hypothesis testers should spend less time testing hypotheses. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 744-755. | 10.1177/1745691620966795 |
| 10.01.25 | Analytical Flexibility | Gould et al. (2023). Same data, different analysts: variation in effect sizes due to analytical decisions in ecology and evolutionary biology | https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/object/6000/download/12075/ |
| 06.12.24 | How to improve psychological theory | Guest, O. (2024). What makes a good theory, and how do we make a theory good?. Computational Brain & Behavior, 1-15. | https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/292762/292762.pdf?sequence=1 |
| 08.11.24 | How to improve psychological theory | Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2021). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 789-802. | 10.1177/1745691620970585 |
| 12.01.24 | How to improve psychological theory | Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., Dalege, J., Kievit, R. A., & Haig, B. D. (2021). Theory construction methodology: A practical framework for building theories in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 756-766. | 10.1177/1745691620969647 |
| 06.10.23 | Does psychology have a theory problem? | Scheel et al. (2021). Why hypothesis testers should spend less time testing hypotheses. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 744-755. | 10.1177/1745691620966795 |
| 01.09.23 | What is a theory? | Fried (2020). Theories and models: What they are, what they are for, and what they are about. Psychological Inquiry, 31(4), 336-344. | 10.1080/1047840X.2020.1854011 |
| 07.07.23 | Quantifying Reproducibility | Youyou et al. (2023). A discipline-wide investigation of the replicability of Psychology papers over the past two decades. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(6) | 10.1073/pnas.2208863120 |
| 05.05.23 | Teaching Open Science | Chopik, Bremner, Defever, and Keller (2018). How (and Whether) to Teach Undergraduates About the Replication Crisis in Psychological Science. Teaching of Psychology, 45(2), 158–163. | 10.1177/0098628318762900 |
| 05.04.23 | Implementing Reproducible Practices | Kathawalla et al. (2021). Easing into open science: A guide for graduate students and their advisors. Collabra: Psychology, 7(1) | 10.1525/collabra.18684 |
| 03.03.23 | Implementing Reproducible Practices | Heise et al. (2023) Ten simple rules for implementing open and reproducible research practices after attending a training course. PLOS Computational Biology, 19(1), e1010750. | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010750 |
| 27.05.22 | Measurement Crisis | Flake & Fried (2020). Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456-465. | 10.1177/2515245920952393 |
| 29.04.22 | Analytic Flexibility | Simmons et al. (2011). False-Positive Psychology. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. | 10.1177/0956797611417632 |
| 25.03.22 | Reproducibility Now | Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716-aac4716 | 10.1126/science.aac4716 |
| 25.02.22 | Case Study: How to Preregister | - | https://osf.io/prereg/ ; https://aspredicted.org/ |
| 28.01.22 | Questionable Research Practices | John et al. (2012). Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. | 10.1177/0956797611430953 |
| 10.12.21 | General Overview | Munafò et al. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature human behaviour, 1(1), 1-9. | 10.1038/s41562-016-0021 |
Weitere Vorschläge sind willkommen!